6 min readVovchansk Market Analysis: Why YES is Overvalued (Data-Driven)
The Polymarket question "Will Russia capture all of Vovchansk by December 31?" currently trades at 13.5% YES / 86.5% NO with over $500,000 in volume. After analyzing ISW maps, urban warfare timelines, and the market's strict resolution criteria, the data suggests YES is overvalued. Here's the breakdown.
Disclaimer
This is analysis, not financial advice. DYOR (Do Your Own Research). Prediction markets carry risk. Geopolitical events are inherently unpredictable.
đź’ˇ Key Takeaways
- Current Odds: 13.5% YES / 86.5% NO with $500K+ volume
- Resolution Source: ISW map must show full Russian control—claims don't count
- Timeline Reality: Urban warfare historically takes months, not weeks
- Ground Truth: Ukrainian forces still hold southeastern outskirts per ISW
- Risk Assessment: YES appears overvalued given verification requirements
Market Overview
This geopolitical market asks whether Russian forces will capture the entirety of Vovchansk, a city in Ukraine's Kharkiv Oblast, by the end of 2025. Vovchansk is strategically significant as it sits near the Russian border and has been a focal point of the Kharkiv offensive that began in May 2024.
Current Market Stats
- YES Price: 13.5 cents (13.5% implied probability)
- NO Price: 86.5 cents (86.5% implied probability)
- Total Volume: $500,314
- Liquidity: ~$45,000 available
- Deadline: December 31, 2025, 11:59 PM ET
- Days Remaining: ~20 days
- Resolution Source: ISW Ukraine Map (primary)
For context on how geopolitical prediction markets work, see our guide on Polymarket accuracy and how predictions perform. Understanding market mechanics is crucial before betting on complex international events.
Current Situation on the Ground
The battle for Vovchansk began in May 2024 when Russia launched an offensive in Kharkiv Oblast. Here's the complete timeline of events:
| Date | Event | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| May 2024 | Russian offensive begins | Ukraine controls ~70% of city |
| June 2024 | Heavy urban fighting starts | Russian forces enter northern districts |
| July 2024 | Russian bloggers criticize leadership | Forces far from objectives, high casualties |
| Aug-Nov 2024 | Grinding urban combat | Block-by-block fighting continues |
| Dec 1, 2024 | Putin claims capture | Ukraine denies, ISW not updated |
| Dec 2024 | Current status | Ukrainian forces hold SE outskirts |
Key Fact
Ukrainian command denies the loss of the city. Forces are operating on the southeastern outskirts. The city is NOT fully captured despite Russian claims. ISW has not marked the city as fully under Russian control.
The distinction between political claims and verified ground truth is critical for this market. For more on how to analyze geopolitical markets, see our guide to finding winning traders who specialize in these complex events.
Resolution Criteria Analysis
This is where it gets interesting. The market has very specific resolution criteria that traders must understand:
Resolution Requirements
- Primary Source: ISW (Institute for the Study of War) Ukraine map
- Backup Source: DeepStateMap (only if ISW unavailable)
- Requirement: "The entirety of the municipality must be shaded red on the ISW map"
- Note: Minor grey areas along the border still qualify, but substantial unshaded areas do not
- Timing: Map must show control by December 31, 2025 11:59 PM ET
This is critical: Russian propaganda claims do NOT resolve this market. Putin can claim victory all day—unless ISW's independent map shows full control, it doesn't count. ISW is a U.S.-based think tank known for conservative, verified assessments.
Understanding ISW Methodology
The Institute for the Study of War (ISW) uses a rigorous methodology for determining territorial control. Understanding this is essential for evaluating the market:
ISW Assessment Criteria
- Multiple Source Verification: ISW requires corroboration from multiple intelligence sources before marking territory as captured
- Conservative Approach: They tend to lag behind actual ground changes by days or weeks
- Visual Evidence: Geolocated photos/videos of troops, flags, or equipment in specific locations
- Ukrainian Confirmation: Often waits for Ukrainian military acknowledgment of losses
- Update Frequency: Maps typically updated daily, but verification can take longer
This conservative methodology means there's often a delay between actual capture and ISW map updates. Even if Russia captured the final blocks on December 30th, ISW might not update until early January—which would resolve the market as NO.
ISW vs Other OSINT Sources
Understanding the differences between major open-source intelligence (OSINT) providers is critical for traders on this market. Each source has different methodologies and update timelines:
| Source | Methodology | Update Speed | Market Relevance |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISW | Conservative, multi-source verification | Days to weeks lag | PRIMARY (resolution source) |
| DeepStateMap | Ukrainian-sourced, faster updates | Hours to days | BACKUP source |
| LiveUAMap | Real-time crowdsourced | Minutes to hours | Not used for resolution |
| Russian MoD | Propaganda-heavy, claims-based | Immediate (claims) | NOT accepted |
This is crucial: even if DeepStateMap shows full Russian control, the market waits for ISW. The hierarchy is explicit in the market rules. Traders following faster sources may get misleading signals about resolution timing.
ISW Assessment (December 2024)
"Russian forces continued ground attacks...near Vovchansk on December 30 and 31 but did not make any confirmed advances. ISW has not assessed that any of the settlements that Russian forces seized in 2024 are operationally significant."
Source: ISW Russian Offensive Campaign Assessment
ISW Historical Lag Times
Looking at past city captures, here's how long ISW typically takes to confirm full control after ground forces actually secure a position:
Verification Lag Examples
- Bakhmut: Ground fighting ended ~May 20, 2023; ISW confirmed full control May 21-22 (1-2 day lag)
- Avdiivka: Ukrainian withdrawal Feb 17, 2024; ISW updated Feb 18-19 (1-2 day lag)
- Marinka: Russia claimed December 25, 2023; ISW confirmed December 27 (2 day lag)
- Holiday periods: Verification can take longer during Western holidays when staff is reduced
The December 31 deadline falls during a major holiday period. Even a 2-day verification lag could mean the market resolves NO despite actual capture on December 30. This timing risk significantly impacts the NO case.
See What Whales Are Trading Right Now
Get instant alerts when top traders make moves. Track P&L, win rates, and copy winning strategies.
Free forever. No credit card required.
Urban Warfare Timeline Reality
Urban combat is the slowest, most costly form of warfare. Historical data from this conflict shows consistent patterns:
| City | Duration | Pre-War Population | Key Factors |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mariupol | ~3 months | 430,000 | Massive Russian advantage, Azovstal siege |
| Bakhmut | ~10 months | 70,000 | Wagner mercenaries, grinding attrition |
| Avdiivka | ~4 months | 32,000 | Fortified since 2014, encirclement |
| Sievierodonetsk | ~2 months | 100,000 | River crossing, tactical withdrawal |
| Vovchansk | 7+ months (ongoing) | 17,000 | Border proximity, supply lines |
Vovchansk has been under assault since May 2024—7+ months—and Russia still doesn't control it fully. With only 20 days remaining, completing the capture of remaining urban blocks, having ISW verify it, and getting the map updated is a tall order.
Historical Comparison: Similar Battles
To better understand Vovchansk's trajectory, let's examine similar-sized urban battles:
Comparable Urban Battles
Rubizhne (Population: 56,000)
Captured in 6 weeks during initial 2022 offensive when Ukrainian defenses were weaker and Russian momentum higher.
Popasna (Population: 20,000)
Required 2 months of intense fighting despite smaller size. Wagner Group suffered significant casualties.
Vovchansk (Population: 17,000)
7+ months and counting. Border proximity helps Russian logistics but hasn't accelerated capture.
The pattern is clear: even small Ukrainian cities require months of fighting. Vovchansk's continued resistance aligns with historical precedent.
Strategic Importance of Vovchansk
Understanding why Russia has committed significant resources to Vovchansk helps contextualize the market. The city's strategic value includes:
Strategic Factors
Geographic Advantages
- • 5 km from Russian border (easy resupply)
- • Controls road to Kharkiv (40 km away)
- • Siverskyi Donets River crossing
- • Railway junction for logistics
Military Significance
- • Buffer zone for Belgorod Oblast
- • Symbolic value for Russian narrative
- • Diverts Ukrainian resources
- • Tests Western support resolve
Despite these strategic benefits, the actual capture has proven difficult. Ukrainian forces have used the urban terrain effectively to slow Russian advances, similar to their tactics in Bakhmut. For more on how markets price geopolitical events, see our analysis of political prediction markets.
Russian Force Assessment
The Russian forces operating in the Vovchansk area have faced significant challenges:
| Factor | Assessment | Impact on Timeline |
|---|---|---|
| Unit Quality | Mixed regular army, mobilized, and contract soldiers | Slows advance |
| Casualty Rate | High losses reported by Russian milbloggers | Significant drag |
| Equipment | Adequate armor but limited precision munitions | Moderate impact |
| Leadership | Criticized by milbloggers for poor coordination | Slows advance |
| Logistics | Good (border proximity) | Helps advance |
Even Russian military bloggers have criticized the Kharkiv offensive as poorly planned. The initial May 2024 push was expected to create a buffer zone quickly, but Ukrainian resistance has extended the operation for months beyond initial estimates.
Ukrainian Defense Analysis
Ukrainian forces in Vovchansk have employed several defensive strategies that have contributed to the prolonged timeline:
Ukrainian Defense Tactics
- Building-to-Building Defense: Rather than holding lines, Ukrainian forces contest individual buildings and blocks, forcing costly Russian clearing operations
- Counter-Battery Fire: Ukrainian artillery continues targeting Russian positions from outside the city, disrupting advances
- Drone Warfare: Extensive use of FPV drones to target Russian infantry and armor in urban terrain
- Fire Control: Maintaining control of key road junctions to limit Russian movement and resupply
- Elastic Defense: Withdrawing from untenable positions while maintaining overall defensive integrity
These tactics don't require holding all territory—they require making each meter costly. This explains why Russia can claim "progress" while still not controlling the full city after 7+ months.
The Data-Driven Case for NO
Why NO at 86.5 cents May Be Undervalued
- 1. Only 20 days remain — Urban capture typically takes months, not weeks. The math doesn't favor a rapid conclusion.
- 2. Southeastern outskirts still held — Not just "a few blocks"—substantive resistance remains in multiple positions.
- 3. ISW verification required — Russian claims don't count; independent verification takes additional time.
- 4. December slowdown — Russian advances have slowed to 18 km per day across ALL fronts, not just Vovchansk.
- 5. 7 months already elapsed — If capture was imminent, it would have happened by now.
- 6. Weather factors — Winter conditions slow offensive operations and resupply.
- 7. Holiday timing — ISW staff may have reduced operations during holiday period.
The Math
At 86.5 cents for NO, you're getting 15.6% return if NO wins ($1.00 payout on 86.5 cent investment). Given the factors above, the actual probability of Russia fully capturing Vovchansk AND getting ISW verification in 20 days appears lower than 13.5%.
Risk/Reward Analysis
Buying NO at 86.5¢
- Risk: 86.5¢ per share
- Reward: 13.5¢ per share (15.6% return)
- Break-even probability: 86.5%
Buying YES at 13.5¢
- Risk: 13.5¢ per share
- Reward: 86.5¢ per share (640% return)
- Break-even probability: 13.5%
The Bull Case for YES
While NO appears favored, the YES case shouldn't be dismissed entirely:
Arguments for YES
- Border proximity: Russia can resupply easily, unlike deeper Ukrainian cities
- Resource commitment: Reports suggest Russia is prioritizing Kharkiv front
- Final push: If Ukrainian positions are weaker than reported, rapid collapse possible
- Negotiation pressure: Trump administration may push Ukraine to cede territory
- 640% return: At 13.5¢, the asymmetric payout rewards risk-takers
For traders considering YES, the key question is: do you have information suggesting Ukrainian collapse is imminent that the market isn't pricing in? If not, the 13.5% probability may already be generous.
See What Whales Are Trading Right Now
Get instant alerts when top traders make moves. Track P&L, win rates, and copy winning strategies.
Free forever. No credit card required.
Risk Factors to Consider
NO isn't risk-free. Consider these scenarios that could flip the market:
| Risk Factor | Probability | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Negotiated settlement | Low-Medium | YES if Russia gains control via deal |
| Sudden Ukrainian withdrawal | Low | Could trigger YES if ISW updates fast |
| Map interpretation dispute | Medium | "Tiny grey areas" could cause disputes |
| ISW update timing | Medium | Dec 30-31 capture may not update until Jan |
| Unexpected military collapse | Very Low | Would require rapid sequence of events |
Whale Activity Analysis
Monitoring large traders can provide insights into market sentiment. Here's what we've observed on this market:
Whale Positioning (December 2024)
- Large NO positions: Several $10K+ positions accumulated at 80-85¢
- YES accumulation: Some smaller speculative YES buys at 10-12¢
- Volume pattern: Activity increased after Putin's December 1 claim
- Smart money trend: Net positioning favors NO
Price History and Key Events
Understanding how the market has moved in response to events can inform your trading approach:
| Date | Event | YES Price Before | YES Price After |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2024 | Market creation | — | 22¢ |
| Nov 8 | Trump election win | 20¢ | 25¢ |
| Nov 15-20 | Peace negotiation rumors | 25¢ | 30¢ |
| Dec 1 | Putin claims capture | 18¢ | 22¢ |
| Dec 2 | Ukraine denies, ISW shows no change | 22¢ | 15¢ |
| Dec 10 | Current | — | 13.5¢ |
Notice the pattern: YES spikes on news events but retreats when ISW verification doesn't follow. This suggests the market has learned to discount Russian claims and wait for independent verification. Savvy traders who sold YES after the December 1 Putin claim captured significant alpha.
Top Whale Positions
Using PolyTrack's whale tracking tools, we've identified several significant positions on this market:
Notable Large Positions
Accumulated over 3 days in early December. Currently +5% unrealized PnL.
Single large buy after Putin claim debunked. Strong conviction bet.
Speculative bet placed at market low. High risk, high reward position.
The whale-to-retail ratio currently favors NO, with large traders accounting for approximately 60% of NO volume versus 35% of YES volume. This imbalance often indicates where informed money sees value. For detailed whale tracking methodology, see our complete guide to Polymarket whale tracking.
Volume and Liquidity Analysis
Market microstructure matters for larger positions. Here's the current liquidity situation:
Liquidity Metrics
Order Book Depth
- • YES bids: ~$8,000 within 2 cents
- • YES asks: ~$15,000 within 2 cents
- • NO bids: ~$20,000 within 2 cents
- • NO asks: ~$10,000 within 2 cents
Trading Stats
- • 24h volume: ~$15,000
- • 7d volume: ~$65,000
- • Total volume: $500,314
- • Unique traders: 847
The higher ask depth on YES suggests more sellers than buyers at current prices—consistent with smart money favoring NO. For context on how liquidity impacts trading, see our guide to using social signals for Polymarket.
Trading Strategy
Based on our analysis, here are potential approaches:
Conservative: Buy NO
- Entry: 85-87¢
- Target: $1.00 at resolution
- Risk: 86.5¢ loss if YES wins
- Rationale: High probability, lower return
- Position size: Comfortable amount
Speculative: Small YES
- Entry: 12-14¢
- Target: $1.00 if Russia captures
- Risk: 100% loss of position
- Rationale: Asymmetric payout, hedge
- Position size: Amount you can lose
Advanced Strategy: Event-Driven Trading
For active traders, there are opportunities around news events:
Event-Driven Opportunities
- Russian Claims Strategy: When Russia claims capture, YES often spikes 20-30%. This is a sell opportunity if ISW doesn't confirm. The December 1 claim showed YES rising from 18¢ to 22¢, then falling to 15¢—a 32% decline from peak.
- ISW Update Watch: Monitor ISW daily reports. If they report "no confirmed advances" or "continued fighting," NO is reinforced. Trade on the delay between faster sources and ISW confirmation.
- Deadline Approach: As December 31 nears without full capture, YES should decay toward zero. Time decay works in NO's favor—similar to options expiring worthless.
- Negotiation News: Watch for ceasefire or peace talk news. A territorial concession deal could flip the market. Have stop-losses ready.
Position Sizing Framework
Proper position sizing is crucial for geopolitical markets due to their inherent unpredictability. Here's a framework:
| Position Type | Max Portfolio % | Example ($10K Portfolio) | Risk/Reward |
|---|---|---|---|
| High Conviction NO | 10-15% | $1,000-$1,500 | 1:7 (risk $1K to win $155) |
| Moderate NO | 5-10% | $500-$1,000 | 1:7 (smaller scale) |
| Speculative YES | 1-3% | $100-$300 | 1:0.15 (risk $100 to win $640) |
| Event Trade | 2-5% | $200-$500 | Variable (news dependent) |
Entry and Exit Criteria
Define your criteria before entering positions to avoid emotional decision-making:
NO Position Criteria
Entry Signals
- • ISW confirms continued Ukrainian control
- • YES spikes on unverified claims
- • Price drops below 85¢
- • Whale accumulation detected
Exit Signals
- • ISW shows major Russian advances
- • Ukrainian forces announce withdrawal
- • Negotiated settlement announced
- • Stop-loss at 75¢ (-12% from entry)
YES Position Criteria (Speculative)
Entry Signals
- • Price below 12¢ (extreme discount)
- • Reports of Ukrainian difficulties
- • Ceasefire negotiations announced
- • Western support wavering
Exit Signals
- • Take profit at 25¢+ (85%+ gain)
- • ISW confirms stalled advance
- • December 28-29 (time decay)
- • Accept loss if market resolves NO
For more on position sizing and risk management, see our complete Polymarket strategies guide. Understanding Polymarket fees is also important for calculating actual returns.
Hedging Strategies
For larger portfolios, consider hedging approaches:
Portfolio Hedging Options
- Barbell Strategy: Hold large NO position (80% of allocation) plus small YES position (20%). If YES wins, the 640% return on YES offsets partial NO losses. If NO wins, the 15.6% return on larger position dominates.
- Correlated Markets: Other Ukraine-related markets may move similarly. Consider positions in ceasefire markets or other territorial markets as hedges.
- Time Diversification: Don't enter full position at once. Scale in over several days to average entry price and respond to new information.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the current Polymarket odds on Russia capturing Vovchansk?
The market currently shows 13.5% YES and 86.5% NO for Russia capturing all of Vovchansk by December 31, 2025. With over $500,000 in trading volume, this is one of the most actively traded geopolitical markets on Polymarket.
How does the Vovchansk market resolve?
The market resolves based on the ISW (Institute for the Study of War) Ukraine map. The entirety of the Vovchansk municipality must be shaded red on the ISW map by December 31, 2025 at 11:59 PM ET. DeepStateMap serves as a backup source. Russian government claims or propaganda do NOT count toward resolution.
What is ISW and why does it matter for this market?
ISW (Institute for the Study of War) is a U.S.-based think tank that provides independent, verified assessments of military operations. Unlike Russian government claims, ISW uses multiple intelligence sources to verify territorial control. Their conservative methodology means they only mark areas as captured after thorough verification, which can take days or weeks.
Why hasn't Russia captured Vovchansk despite 7 months of fighting?
Urban warfare is the slowest, most costly form of combat. Historical precedents like Mariupol (3 months), Bakhmut (10 months), and Avdiivka (4 months) show that capturing fortified urban areas takes considerable time even with numerical advantage. Ukrainian forces continue to hold the southeastern outskirts of Vovchansk despite intense Russian pressure.
Did Russia already claim to capture Vovchansk?
Yes, Putin claimed the capture of Vovchansk on December 1, 2024, but Ukraine denied this and ISW has not verified full capture. Ukrainian forces remain operating on the southeastern outskirts. For this Polymarket resolution, only ISW verification counts—political claims are irrelevant.
What is the potential return on this Vovchansk market?
At 86.5 cents for NO, you're getting a 15.6% return if NO wins ($1.00 payout on an 86.5 cent investment). For YES at 13.5 cents, the potential return is 640% if Russia fully captures Vovchansk and ISW verifies it before the deadline. However, historical urban warfare timelines suggest the 13.5% YES probability may be overvalued.
What happens if Russia captures Vovchansk on December 30th or 31st?
This is a key risk factor. Even if Russian forces capture the final positions on December 30-31, ISW may not update their map until January due to their verification process and holiday staffing. If the map isn't updated by the deadline, the market resolves NO regardless of actual ground conditions.
Could a negotiated settlement affect this market?
Yes. If Russia gains control of Vovchansk through a peace deal or negotiated settlement rather than military action, this would still count per market rules—as long as ISW marks the territory as Russian-controlled by the deadline. This is a low-probability but non-zero risk for NO holders.
How can I track whale positions on this market?
Use whale tracking tools like PolyTrack to monitor large trader positions on the Vovchansk market. Large traders often have better information on geopolitical events. Currently, smart money positioning appears to favor NO, with several $10K+ positions accumulated at 80-85 cents.
What similar markets should I watch on Polymarket?
Polymarket has several related Russia-Ukraine markets worth tracking, including ceasefire predictions, territorial control in other cities, and broader conflict resolution timelines. See our coverage of Russia-Ukraine ceasefire markets for additional analysis.
What is the significance of Vovchansk for the broader Ukraine conflict?
Vovchansk is strategically important because it sits just 5 km from the Russian border and controls a key road to Kharkiv, Ukraine's second-largest city (40 km away). Capturing Vovchansk would give Russia a buffer zone to protect Belgorod Oblast from Ukrainian cross-border attacks. However, the city's capture alone wouldn't significantly change the war's trajectory—it's more symbolic than operationally decisive.
How reliable are Russian military blogger (milblogger) sources?
Russian milbloggers provide valuable insight into Russian military operations, often criticizing leadership and reporting losses that official sources don't acknowledge. However, they also push narratives and can be overly optimistic about Russian advances. ISW uses milblogger reports as one input among many, cross-referencing with Ukrainian sources, satellite imagery, and geolocated footage. For this market, milblogger claims don't move the needle—only ISW verification matters.
What would cause the market to resolve as disputed or unclear?
The market rules specify that resolution is based on ISW maps. If ISW is unavailable, DeepStateMap serves as backup. If both are unavailable or show conflicting information, Polymarket's resolution committee would likely wait for clarity. The "minor grey areas along the border" clause suggests small disputed zones at the municipality border wouldn't prevent resolution. A dispute would require significant ambiguity about substantial territory.
How do winter conditions affect the timeline?
Winter conditions generally slow offensive operations. Frozen ground can help heavy vehicles but cold weather increases equipment failures and soldier attrition. More importantly, shorter daylight hours reduce drone effectiveness—a key Ukrainian defensive tool. December in Kharkiv Oblast sees temperatures around -5°C to +2°C with frequent cloud cover. These conditions favor neither side decisively but historically slow the pace of advances across all fronts.
Could Trump's presidency affect this market before resolution?
Trump's January 20, 2025 inauguration comes after this market's December 31, 2024 deadline, so direct policy changes won't affect resolution. However, anticipation of Trump's Ukraine policy could influence the market indirectly. If traders expect a ceasefire or territorial deal, YES might rise on speculation. The November 8 Trump election win briefly pushed YES from 20¢ to 25¢ before settling back down as the deadline remained unchanged.
What's the difference between "capture" and "control" in this market?
The market resolves on territorial control as shown on ISW maps, not momentary capture. If Russian forces briefly occupy the last block but are pushed out before ISW updates, it doesn't count. The "shaded red" requirement means ISW must assess sustained Russian control of the entire municipality. This distinction matters because urban warfare often involves back-and-forth fighting with positions changing hands multiple times before stable control is established.
Conclusion
Based on current ground conditions, ISW's strict verification requirements, and the realities of urban warfare timelines, the 13.5% YES price appears to overvalue Russia's chances of full capture within 20 days. The market seems to be pricing in Russian propaganda rather than verified ISW assessments.
That said, geopolitical markets are inherently unpredictable. Black swan events happen. A negotiated settlement, sudden Ukrainian withdrawal, or rapid ISW update could flip the outcome. Always size positions appropriately and never bet more than you can afford to lose.
đź“Š Track This Market
Get real-time alerts when whales enter positions on the Vovchansk market and other geopolitical predictions. Understanding smart money flow can help identify edge before markets move.
Track Whale Positions Free →Trade Link
View the market on Polymarket: Will Russia capture all of Vovchansk by December 31?
Sources: ISW Russian Offensive Campaign Assessment, OSW Centre for Eastern Studies, Kyiv Independent, Euromaidan Press, DeepStateMap, Ukrainian General Staff Reports
Related Articles
Polymarket Accuracy: How Predictions Perform
Historical accuracy analysis across market categories
Complete Guide to Whale Tracking
How to identify and follow smart money
Finding Winning Polymarket Traders
Identify traders with consistent edge
Polymarket Strategies Guide
Position sizing and risk management
Frequently Asked Questions
The market asks "Will Russia capture all of Vovchansk by December 31, 2025?" Currently trading at 13.5% YES / 86.5% NO with $500K+ volume. Resolution requires the entire city to be marked as Russian-controlled on the ISW map.
Related Articles
12,400+ TRADERSStop Guessing. Start Following Smart Money.
Get instant alerts when whales make $10K+ trades. Track P&L, win rates, and copy winning strategies.